One direction, many campuses
A shared operating model so every campus and unit moves the same way, instead of a hundred disconnected pilots re-litigating the same questions.
You don't need the manual, your teams do. This is the president's and system leader's view: why this is worth your name, what only you can decide, what it costs, and how a multi-campus system adopts it without flattening what makes each campus different.
Not features, outcomes a president is judged on. The tools underneath exist to produce these four.
A shared operating model so every campus and unit moves the same way, instead of a hundred disconnected pilots re-litigating the same questions.
Decisions, ownership, and oversight documented to a standard that holds up to a board, an auditor, a regulator, and a reporter, before you need it to.
Low-risk uses get a decision in days, not months, while genuinely high-stakes systems get real scrutiny. Speed and safety stop being a trade-off.
Transparency and recourse built in, so when an AI-assisted decision affects a student or an employee, there is a clear, defensible answer to “why?”
Most of this framework is delegated work. These four are not, they are the decisions a system president or chancellor cannot hand down, and the reason your sponsorship matters.
System-wide principles and a minimum bar every campus meets. This is the one thing a campus cannot set for itself, and the one thing only you can.
Delegate real decision rights to a chartered body or a named lead. Sponsorship without a named owner is where system AI efforts quietly die.
Whether AI capability is rationed by who can pay, campus by campus, or provided as shared infrastructure, is a mission decision, not an IT one.
Affirm that teaching, assessment, and integrity decisions stay with faculty through shared governance. Your backing makes that credible system-wide.
Campuses sit at genuinely different readiness levels. The system's job is to set a floor without flattening those differences, so the most advanced campus isn't held back and the least ready isn't left exposed.
Ratifies shared principles, a minimum governance bar, and common definitions. Provides templates, shared licenses where it makes sense, and a place to compare notes.
Keeps itLight. It sets direction and a floor, not a single mandate every campus must implement identically.
Adapts principles to local mission, stands up governance that fits its size, and moves at the speed its capacity allows, above the shared minimum.
Keeps itIts autonomy. Campus culture, governance, and risk tolerance differ, and the framework is built to be adapted, not copied.
A regular reflect-and-reset across campuses surfaces what's working, raises the floor as the system matures, and turns isolated wins into shared practice.
Keeps itMomentum. Alignment scales through cadence and comparison, not through a bottleneck at the center.
Three moves, in order. Deliberately light, this is the start-light path, not a standing bureaucracy. See the full 90-day motion
Delegate decision rights to a cross-functional group or a named system lead. Fold it into a meeting that already exists rather than standing up a new committee.
Adopt shared principles and a minimum governance bar through governance, so every campus has direction and the senate has a seat.
Pick one real, visible use case, score it, decide it, and produce a board-ready artifact. Prove the motion works before scaling it.
Everything a president needs to make the case is already built and printable.
The whole model and the single 90-day ask on one printable page you can forward before a meeting.
Open the one-pagerHow the framework maps to NIST, ISO/IEC 42001, the EU AI Act, and other recognized standards, the credibility a board looks for.
See the alignmentOwnership models, cost tiers, what not to do in year one, failure modes, and how to take it to faculty senate.
For cabinet & board